Posted by -ADDED TO THE GAME-Studding for lioness

Shy (#51494)

Remarkable
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2015-12-27 10:06:29
We have probably all faced it before where we have a beautiful lioness that would be great for a reverse studding. However with the new terns of service such breedings are no longer allowed.

I think we should have the option to stud out our lioness like we stud our males. But in order to even have the option we would have to pay a certain amount amount tof SB or GB to unlock the feature. This way no one could be scamed out of their currencies, while also being a function of the games in game breeding. Thus making it legal and safe to do reverse studdings.



This suggestion has 74 supports and 11 NO supports.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Ashley (#76639)

Impeccable
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2015-12-27 10:11:25
agreed



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Smartie (#67158)

Dreamboat of Ladies
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2015-12-27 10:11:34
I support this way too much. But I think it is on the rejected list of ideas. I think it is something with the coding that would mess the game up.

EDIT:

rejected ideas thread



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?


Edited on 27/12/15 @ 17:14:29 by Smartie{Merry Christmas!} (#67158)

theRavenflight🇵
(#59350)

Demonic
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2015-12-27 10:12:16
I agree. I know that the reason for it being against the rules is so that nobody gets scammed. However, I for one have been scammed multiple times in other ways. I have sent items, SB, lions, etc. for raffle tickets, only for the owner of the raffle to ignore everyone when the raffle was supposed to end. I have played in forum games like "wishes granted" or "TPBMGA" and have never gotten the items I was supposed to get.

When doing something with another person on this site, we are risking it. We don't know if the person on the other side is trustworthy or not, and it is up to us to risk it or not. I think the ability to stud lionesses is a great idea. I am eager to hear what others think.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

theRavenflight🇵
(#59350)

Demonic
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2015-12-27 10:15:08
Shoot, Smartie is right, is has been rejected, but there doesn't seem to be a direct reason for it.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Smartie (#67158)

Dreamboat of Ladies
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2015-12-27 10:17:40
I know it sucks. I have tried for this before too. I wish they would state a direct reason, but they haven't. Yet people do reverse studdings all the time. If you want it bad enough, you just have to take the risks, I guess.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

theRavenflight🇵
(#59350)

Demonic
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2015-12-27 10:21:24
It is against the rules, unfortunately. If you are caught your topic will get locked (if it's on the forums) and you risk suspension of the account. That's why a legal lioness studding would be great; wouldn't have to worry about breaking the rule of "promise-based transaction".



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Smartie (#67158)

Dreamboat of Ladies
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2015-12-27 10:23:55
I know! It's like, and a raffle isn't promise based?



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Shy (#51494)

Remarkable
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2015-12-27 10:38:01
Right that's what I'm saying. There are plenty of other things that should be considered as promised base but arnt.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Blue Pigeon 🐦 (#68580)

Warrior
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2015-12-28 00:17:25
If the rules of promised based transactions were followed as the topic they are on says, then a lot of raffles should be closed, as they rely on promised-base transactions. Some even involve free studdings/ lionesses. Heck, some auctions on this site are technically promised-based. Whilst I am not for stopping any of these, it seems a bit strange that these have been sort-of condoned whilst reverse studding is not.
Originally, there was no studding on Lioden so these promised-base transactions were common. Then studding was implemented and theses 'traditional studdings' became rarer. It would be the same if reverse studding was implemented. If these promised-base reverse studdings are to become rarer, make an ingame solution.
Also, tiger stripe markings are in the rejected board, but we have feline 6. It was stated that blue lions would never be created but we have Ice. Just because something was dismissed in the past does not mean that it will never be reconsidered.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

theRavenflight🇵
(#59350)

Demonic
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2015-12-28 12:43:08
Then I hope this becomes implemented at some point. Very good points.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Shy (#51494)

Remarkable
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2016-01-22 02:47:30
See they just made purple eyes after constantly saying they were not going to. I really feel this would be a good idea.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Blue Pigeon 🐦 (#68580)

Warrior
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2016-01-22 03:25:17
And, more crucially, they have made an official raffle system. Whilst this is for clan use, this is condoned and specially made by the site. Whilst user raffles can still happen, this method is more safe.
Whose to say that something similar can't happen to reverse studding?



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

theRavenflight🇵
(#59350)

Demonic
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2016-01-22 08:05:07
Here's hoping to this change being implemented!!!



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Lady Zafira (#10834)

Deathlord of the Jungle
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2016-01-31 14:03:35
I agree with this I just have some questions. Normal studding, you breed your female to a male, you build the nest and feed it, if the male is the one to breed to the female, you will be stuck with the task of building the nest, maybe add a feature where they male has to send over some form of nest make material along with the stud fee. The female initially keeps the cubs, soo would the cubs be sent automatically to the fathers den once they hit 5 months?



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Shy (#51494)

Remarkable
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2016-01-31 14:08:20
Good questions. I had not though about that, maybe something where certain cubs were to be sentered over when they hit 5 months old. Meaning that the owner of the he father would pick which cubs they wanted and when they were 5 months old those cubs would be sent over. As far as nesting goes though I think the owner of the Hehe female should still provide the nesting materials



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?







Memory Used: 622.87 KB - Queries: 0 - Query Time: 0.00000 - Total Time: 0.01075s