I love this idea! Maybe for the first two:

Achievement Start!

And Half Way Completionist

You have liked this post!

@Black Wings // I love it! I'll add them in!

You have liked this post!

Meta-achievements are interesting and kinda fun as an idea, but it might be hard to calculate it as more achievements get added.

To explain a bit more, I'm familiar with games that shift the meta-achievement threshold for something as more are added, and some that leave the old achievements alone but add new meta-achievements for the new achievements. Like a game with a seasonal sort of event might have a meta-achievement for getting all the season-related achievements, and the next time that season happens, they either make the old meta-achievement "2022 season achievements completed" and make the new one "2023 season achievements completed" -- or they might just require anyone who didn't do them all the first year to get all the new ones plus whatever they didn't have of the old ones in order to get the "season meta-achievement."

What you're suggesting seems like it would require Lioden to add the new ones to the old achievement, but since it's for ALL achievements, then every time a new achievement is added, the ALL achievement would need to be recalculated for "25% of all achievements is now this number," and do that over and over again for every percentage. Plus calculating "getting this meta-achievement for 25% completion" into the next percentage tier of meta-achievements. And though I don't know how achievements are coded and how much work it is to do it, it does seem that it adds a lot of work each time the dev team adds achievements, which might make them less inclined to add new achievements in the first place. Now, that would solve the problem of having to recalculate this idea, after all you don't have to recalculate for new achievements if there aren't any new achievements, but in my mind, if it came down to it, I would rather get new achievements added for unique things, instead of a batch of meta-achievements for percentage done and then fewer or no more new unique achievements.

So I'm afraid that I Don't Support on this one. I just don't see it as interesting enough to be worth the work it would add. I don't care as much about "here's an achievement for getting 50% of the achievements you can currently get" as I would care about new achievements for just about anything else I can imagine.

You have liked this post!

That's fair! I think there's a bit of a misunderstanding though?

These aren't achievements for getting achievements, these are simply titles as a sort of "reward". They wouldn't be adding to the achievement list in any way.

I do get your point that as more achievements are added the threshold for 25%, 50% etc would change but seeing as it's just a title rewarded for getting a certain % at that time and not something more valuable like a special applicator etc, and seeing as your achievement status isn't public I don't think it's a big deal if you get a title for hitting 50% of the achievements and then more get added, bringing it down to 49%.

To clarify by "title" I mean the titles you can put before or after your King's name!

Quick edit: I also think if you get the title you should keep it regardless of if more achievements get added. It's already pretty hard to get all the achievements so it's not like anyone can get a special title for 100% "easily" and as before it's just a title, just something fun for trying to get the achievements and nothing with any monetary value.

You have liked this post!