Clarifications (added as needed)

1. Someone on the other thread didn't understand what I meant with the breeding system. Let me break it down for you.

They was a time when if [Parent A] had a marking (For example, Celestial Speckles) in a slot (We'll say slot 2) & [Parent B] had the same marking (Celestial Speckles) in another slot (For say, slot 6), then the [Cub] that was born from mating [Parent A] & [Parent B] would have a chance to get two celestial speckle markings. One in slot 2 from [Parent A] & one in slot 6 from [Parent B]. If [Parent A] had 3 celestial markings, but [Parent B] had none, the cub would still have a chance to obtain all 3 markings from [Parent A] (and vice versa if [Parent B] had the markings. This is after you take in consideration that a king's markings will roll before a females do. So make sure the king either has an empty slot where you want the females to be, or the male has the markings you want.

With the new system, which they did not warn us about implementing, no matter how many markings (Celestial Speckles for this example) are on each lion, the cub will only ever get 1. If you breed [Parent A] who has celestial speckles in slot 2 & 3 with [Parent B] who has celestial speckles in slot 4 & 6, you no longer have the chance for a quad celestial speckle. You will get one of the four slots. And that is the issue.

--------------

2. [--]

Possible Additions

[Fart Springboard; Patch Notes + Breaking News]

[Re: Fart Springboard; Patch Notes + Breaking News; Locations + Layout]

@Lex

I don't personally use Gnawrocks because I think they are useless, but can you use more than one per parent per breeding (like use 2 gnawrocks to pass a fathers x2 onyx), or would you have to use it on one and hope the other naturally passes? Either way it sounds too expensive, especially considering you would have to gnawrock every time you bred the stud if you wanted the double marking...

@Lex

Ouch.

@Fart, I agree.

I was just thinking about this again and I wanna add a little more.
These patch notes shouldn't be sorted like the news. It should be a continuous page so that users can easily F4 (search) for any specific topics they may be needed. Finding things in the news is so hard to find bc you have to find the specific post based on headings (That might not pertain to what you need so you have to guess), and then you have to F4 all the filler away. I had to search at least 3 pages of news posts to find something once.

As for a place for them to be linked, I was thinking on the "News" tab; underneath the "Game Polls" & "Referrals" links.

"Breaking News" could be a long bar that stretches above "News" and the "Game Poles"/"Referrals" links.

@Vampire

Are you, uh, actually going to face any of my points? Of course the entire base is hard to please, as there are over 100,000 of us (possibly), but this change they made had no reason to it. There was no one (that I know of) out there saying 'you know what I hate? breeding double markings and colors." because it doesn't really happen unless you're trying to make it happen. Unless you're using applicators you've got to breed for that shit. I'm suggesting this be reversed because it doesn't hurt anyone to be able to do it, but it hurts people to not be able to.

You're also not even bothering to address the fact that this was a massive change, and the staff didn't even bother to tell us. I've wasted over 50Gb on my Margay overload project, Typhon wasted like 100Gb, Lex sold an expensive heir; all because we were under the impression that the old system was still in place. There was no reason for it to be removed, and no warning on its removal.
Also, you're clearly wrong in your post. The staff are not good at communicating changes to the community as a whole. Many of the commonly known players have already agree to this (not limited to, but including; Thalath, Lex, and Fart).

Did you even read the entirety of the post?