Posted by Give our Kings a Queen

Garet (#19860)

King of the Jungle
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2013-11-24 04:29:46
Since we do have one dominant male, why not have one dominant female as well? Asiatic lions have female-run prides, and within African prides, there are dominant females. It'd still be realistic, even moreso than what we have now.
I've got a few ideas that might make her useful, rather than 'just a pretty lioness we can't chase';

Our Queen would be locked to our accounts and be given her own slot. The Queen wouldn't take up a territory slot, and like our Kings, we could only have one Queen per pride. It should cost the same to retire her as it would a King, and she would not run off if too hungry or bored. Yes, you will have to play with and feed your Queen.

Like Kings, we would be able to chose an heir for her when retiring or when she comes of age. We would be able to chose to keep her looks or use those of the new Queen. Thus, we could customize her or her heir and keep that look for as long as we want to.

Unlike other females, the Queen wouldn't go hunting. She would have a different way of gaining stats. The Queen would be in charge of domestic-related issues. Teaching cubs /adolescents to hunt, fending off males/females at our borders, the likes. Each hour, we could chose to have her perform one of these duties and gain stats/exp. The former would also have a small chance of giving cubs stats, along with a slightly higher chance of giving the Queen stats. The Queen would only be able to take up to five cubs/adolescents under her wing at a time.

She would be able to breed as well, but I think a cub with a Queen should get slightly higher stats. Nothing insane like +50 in all stats, but something small, like +1-5 across the boards.

Edit: Like people have mentioned, this should be optional, like with submales. That way people wouldn't have to necessarily get one if they don't want one.



This suggestion has 1711 supports and 112 NO supports.



Hrt Icon 1 player likes this post! Like?

Edited on 01/12/13 by Garet (#19860)

Sarkshine (#138592)

Deathlord of the Jungle
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-04-22 16:33:18
No support for similar reasons to firecracker



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

🌟cuntagious🌟 (#64137)

Bone Collector
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-05-04 22:28:56
Guys, this idea is 5 years old. why are yall still discussing it?



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Necolasa (#79257)

Sweetheart
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-05-05 08:45:36
Because it is still a valid suggestion with over 1,000 supports



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

🌟cuntagious🌟 (#64137)

Bone Collector
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-05-05 08:48:44
well, 5 years and still nothing about it being implemented, so i'd say it's time to give it a rest.
can't say for sure tho, who knows.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Necolasa (#79257)

Sweetheart
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-05-05 08:54:00
Nope, if there was need of that the site owner would have said otherwise and closed comments as has been done with other suggestions that weren't up for debate. Just because you might not agree doesn't mean others can't still discuss it.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

🌲🏛 Latin
Woods 🏛🕊 (#135952)

Sinister
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-05-05 11:09:33
I support, I made a lioness (The only one *cough*) my main male's ''queen.''



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

di [side] (#132173)

Wicked
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-06-13 17:08:27
Support. :D



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?


Edited on 01/08/19 @ 20:44:00 by miso [main] (#126735)

Urano (#118565)

Prince of Terror
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-06-13 18:53:38
I’m just going to say this, if we are talking about real lion prides then piebalds, dwarves, primals, and the other half of the mutations for the lions shouldn’t exist. Primal lions don’t exist anymore nor are there small lions running around, or half of the bases we have like rhodonite, topaz, cinnas, etc. They don’t exist yet we have it in the game, technically this game is part real part fantasy (especially the events where there are monsters and gods) so a king having a queen on lioden is possible here



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Anime Dove (#133262)

Heavenly
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-06-30 14:53:45


I love this idea!
I'd love to have a queen



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

owl's side (#127201)

Magnificent
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-07-10 07:50:53
yes i love this idea!



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

SurfMutt (#1178)

Devastator
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-07-26 08:43:28
Support! I think it's a really cute idea that could add a little extra flavor to pride structure and interactions. Even if it's not entirely realistic, neither is the grandpaw slot but we have that now as well! I love the little flavor texts and just the idea of the grandpaw in general, and I think that a queen slot like this could work to the same effect.

Just like grandpaw, it could be a completely optional thing so that those who don't want to have one fixed queen would have the ability to just ignore the concept all together. The fact that the grandpaw can pass straight onto the dynasty if you want him to is nice, and that if you want to have him hang around for an extra year of his life then you have that option too! If the queen slot worked similarly - that you have the choice to appoint a queen or to just ignore it all together - then it would have my definite support.

Of course, that also means that any in-game advantages of having a fixed queen would need to be pretty minimal, that way people who choose not to have one aren't missing out on some crazy stat boosts or breeding advantage or anything like that.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Lynx (#159819)

King of the Jungle
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-10-22 10:51:13
Support, just like others have said, I think it's a really cool idea and would be a fun optional idea. Not mandatory, of course, and again, like others have said, sure, maybe not realistic, but neither are blue lions and Nirah but we have those.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Archeops [starting
over] (#132170)

Hateful
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-11-14 03:36:19
i support this idea! it would need to be optional, of course. since most people wouldnt want to use it, it could be something that needs to be unlocked with a couple gb. that way if someone wants it, they need to work for it. i also dont think the queen should be so powerful as to give stat boosts to cubs/adols every hour, rather, maybe have her as the leader of hunts, and when she goes along on a hunt, youve got better chances of getting rarer/bigger prey? and maybe a boost to the stats of the other lionesses joined in the hunt? since we DO have broodmothers for protecting cubs, cub training, and adol training already. there could also be a maximum amount of slots for the queen, maybe 5? and each one needs to be unlocked with gb.

actually, maybe she COULD do something useful with cubs. give her the same amount of breedings and cooldown days, but maybe since shes considered the best hunter, let her finish nursing her cubs at 3 or 4 months of age? going off the assumption that those cubs are protected by a broodmother, maybe the broodmother stepped in early to allow the queen to resume hunting sooner(i know lionesses can hunt immediately after having cubs, but still)



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

EntityofSilo | G4 (#107570)

Badland Strider
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-11-18 12:34:32
You could just lab test frog & pose to have a queen tbh. Pretty much the same, no extra work for coders. As far as I'm concerned this already exists



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Ateia (#59721)

Sweetheart
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2019-04-26 19:39:35
support



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?


Edited on 26/04/19 @ 19:40:13 by Ateia (#59721)







Memory Used: 641.98 KB - Queries: 0 - Query Time: 0.00000 - Total Time: 0.00522s