Posted by -LOCKED - -ADDED TO THE GAME-End Stud Racing? (140+ Supporters!)

Lady Zafira (#10834)

Deathlord of the Jungle
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2016-02-08 13:54:57
Stud Racing: The process of sending multiple stud requests for one lioness to 2 or more lions.

I have yet to come across a stud racer but I have heard the term and found a post dedicated to stud racing. At first I thought nothing of it until I got clarification. People with high valued studs have had an issue with people sending a breeding request to their stud, then sending 10 other studs a request for the same lioness. I noticed VLF lionesses are the ones mainly used for stud racing as it takes longer to in-pregnant them. The issue I see, (after breeding my own VLF's) and others see is; you spend 50% of energy trying to in-pregnant a lioness, while at the same time ANOTHER lion is also trying with that same female. Now say it wasn't you that got her pregnant but the other lion...you just wasted 50% of your energy and the breeding items you may or may not have used on your male, plus your stud payment.

I see stud Racing as a type of free breeding in a way as to say, the male that wasted his energy/items on your girl, did it for nothing. I do not see that as fair and personally count those attempts as breeding attempts I would want to be compensated for.

My suggestions for this is to either;
A) Change the system to where you can send ONE breeding request per female and if you wish to send another, cancel the previous
Flipicus: You would get the option to tick/untick a box which creates different text above/below the stud rules section, for example:
'This player DOES NOT accept stud race requests- you will not be able to send another request for your lioness unless you remove theirs first' when its turned off.
OR
'This player accepts stud race requests, they will be notified if you send other requests for your lioness' when it's turned on.
Or~
B) If the system is to stay the same, the male that wasted his energy on the female, gets half the amount of SB his studding fee was, (I.E your males fee is 500, if the female is stud raced to another male that gets her pregnant you are given 250 either from that player or the game itself) so their males time and energy wasn't wasted for no reason. ( this would not count if they stud request is rejected by the lion, or taken back by the females owner ).
Axel's suggestion:
As compensation, there should be something that mirrors the effort of the stud.
The more times he tried to breed her, the more % of the stud price he will get.
There should be a certain number of tries where the stud owner would get the whole price as a compensation if another stud made the girl pregnant (or if the owner of the girl took the girl out of the stud's list). I think this is the most fair.

Or~
C) (just throwing this in, this can be combined with A or B) Allow the males to set a certain % limit that blocks out any lionesses below that limit. I know most people don't check it, but the game itself should know right?


I can understand the need to in-pregnant a VLF in the 3 days it's in heat by sending multiple request for the same female to different lions, but think of it this way. If you spent half your energy/day/items trying to breed a VLF and another lion beats you to it. You just wasted time and energy for nothing. As Dunnart stated, this can be seen as taken advantage of the males effort for your own personal gain, while leaving the male stuck out and possible irritated.


I am not sure if it would work, especially because what if the player wasted 100% energy or 50% energy on the girl and goes off, and in the mean time the girl gets pregnant by another stud, the extra 50%-100% energy gets added right away/or after the user logs in. BUT. The energy will replenish every 15 mins for 10%, even if the player is offline. Wouldnt he lose the additional energy once he gets back because his energy replenished anyway?
In addition to the game giving back SB, maybe (the Developers can decide) To give back boosters or boost items for the energy used

Other Suggestions by users:
Pine 62380~> Perhaps, if the person is to send another breeding request to another male, and that male gets the lioness pregnant, the male whom she studded first gets his energy back?
Reebuh 3487~ I can agree with all of it, save for part B & C of your plan. I think sending one request per lioness until a) the stud accepts/rejects or b) the owner of the lioness takes the studding back needs to implemented, instead of just allowing it to continue to happen. Some people don't have the SB for part B of your idea, and receiving the energy back just seems like more coding that's going to take up more space, just like part B would. I think removing part B & C would make this more easily supportable, just flat out removing the option to spam requests and only let there be one request per lion.

YoungLioness 15579~ I admit to having done at least one of these stud races with a 1% girl, but I've always rewarded participants with at least 200sb for their efforts. I've also been a participant in a stud race, and know the feeling of working hard with a lioness only to be unsuccessful and gain nothing in return .I think B would be the best option to go with, and C could be a separate support thread all on its own!

Dunart 29090~I've noticed some stud owners don't mind when they're 'stud raced' while others don't want anything to do with VLF's at all. Perhaps Options A and C (and maybe B as well) could be incorporated into the game in a way that would allow each user to set their studding service to what suits them best? If Option B isn't added as a possible setting, it'd probably be best if people could still choose to keep things as they are so they can be especially VLF friendly if they want.

If your support is no, please provide a reason as to why you said no, so I can try to better this idea



This suggestion has 728 supports and 76 NO supports.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Edited on 12/02/16 @ 08:35:37 by Alphonse (#10834)

Hawkeye (#55590)

Blessed
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2016-02-11 09:50:38
I never said it wasn't my responsibility. I know that it is. And so yes, I took responsibility, and looked for people online with the studs I needed for a good 20 minutes and sent out requests. I have no problem sending out requests to multiple people at a time if it's an emergency and my lionesses aren't VLF. If they ate VLF then yes, I do personally send out a message to let them know I might be sending to multiple studs. But of there's no loss to the stud for an average or higher, than I don't send a message. I don't need to. And I don't know what the technicalities would be Axel. Yes, i think it would be a dick move to do that. And it's always wise to say you don't accept stud racers. But there will always be the people who jip you and do it anyways. Like I said. I'm game for the notifications when a female already studded to you has been sent to another stud, and I'm fine with studs that failed getting some energy back. The only thing I didn't agree with is having to pay SB in order to do it, and I don't agree with putting a 'switch' on it. The studding info section is there for a reason, and even if people don't, people should read and abide by it before requesting to your stud.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Lady Zafira (#10834)

Deathlord of the Jungle
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2016-02-11 10:22:34
@Hawkeye, there is a chance you wont send the sb and a chance you will, depending on what the admin decide is fair for the male that wasted his energy. The switch is a good thing to avoid multiple stud requests at the last minute, especially for those who out right ignore the info in males studding page. This would save energy of males who do not wish to be stud raced and would save SB and or items that the male would receive in compensation for wasted efforts.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Fart (#25392)

Holy
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2016-02-11 12:29:52
I would support a message of some sort notifying you when a player has sent multiple requests for the same lioness, but I don't see how compensation is necessary, and the proposed systems seem overly complicated and doomed to be either unfair or game-breaking anyways.

When you accept a stud request you always run the risk that you'll "waste" your energy. You don't have to accept a request just because it was sent to you. If you don't want to risk getting roped into a stud race or wasting time on a VLF, check the lioness before accepting. I'd support making it easier to decide whether or not to accept (by way of revealing whether or not you have competition for the stud fee), but I don't support removing normal functions of the game or compensating people for normal energy loss.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

ClockKey (#74714)

Heavenly
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2016-02-11 12:50:37
I agree



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Koah (#42056)

King of the Jungle
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2016-04-10 15:37:09
I've never participated in a stud race, and honestly, I only learned what it was by reading this thread. I can see where people would find it fun, but I don't think I'd want to be involved- especially as a stud... Looking at it from both sides, I agree with FlipicusPup's idea about the box to check or uncheck.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

🌈nixie🌈|clean (#94402)


View Forum Posts


Posted on
2016-11-05 21:35:08
Support. Just this morning I had someone's request removed (no notice which is against my studding rules) after I'd started breeding her. I found out that she was bred by another lion. When I messaged the user they said "Well I guess you took too long". Like wtf. I started breeding her ffs! And I'm 100% VLF friendly; I breed til pregnant. I feel like users that stud race don't value the time it takes for studs to breed VLFs especially when you get multiple at the same time like I do. If there could be a toggle where you can accept only lionesses that have a request sent to your lion only, that'd be great. I lost energy with this guy when I could have been exploring.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

DCS (#66622)

King of the Jungle
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2017-08-30 18:25:50
I agree with this a lot. I recently just got stud raced on as in my stud was sent a request but the user also sent other lions requests as well and I wasn't fast enough.

I think option A would be allowed except maybe without the messages. The same system could be used but once you send in a request for one lion, it will disappear from the selection list until you cancel your request.

Honestly, I support this.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

CALA (#105146)


View Forum Posts


Posted on
2017-08-30 19:31:59
Personally, I have no problem with stud racing. I think if people have courtesy, then they follow the individual players' rules in relation to this. I think the better option would be for individual players to be able to set 'allow/do not allow stud-racing' on their own personal king - rather than any change affecting the ENTIRETY.. because I for one stud race on occasion AND allow stud racing.

I think having an option to select allow/disallow stud racing will just make things a whole lot easier, tidier, and make more sense. Then it is up to the individual. If you set your lion for 'do not allow stud racing'; any lioness bred to him will be put on a 'breeding cooldown' and be unable to be chosen from stud lists on other Kings. If stud racing is allowed with the king, however, then the breeding cool-down will not happen. That way, it protects everyone's interests.. And I think it'd be a whole lot easier for the coders to implement into the game.

That is why I chose no support :) If the above was the suggestion, then I would definitely support <3



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Axel (#6627)

Pervert
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2017-09-03 01:56:08
Why isnt this in the game yet?

Anyway, after so much time, I have a new view regarding this issue and how to solve it.

I think the best and most fair would be to implement an optional A for studs. Being able to choose if they want to accept stud races or not. Obviously, only lionesses can send requests who dont have requests anywhere else and they cannot send requests to other studs either.

BUT

I do think some kind of compensation system should be put in for people who block stud races. Not for those who allow it. Because in the end, even if I waste an entire energy bar on a VLF, the person can still cancel the stud request to send to another stud.

-------------------------------

I think the best compensation would be SB instead of energy. The SB is paid by the person and not by the game to prevent abuse. And it is only paid if the owner of the lioness cancels the request, not if the stud does. The SB price depends on how much % energy the stud used. For every 20% energy, there should be a predetermined SB price in case of a cancel. This price is determined either by the game, taking the current average GB prices into account, or by the owner of the stud.

Again, this would only work for those who do not allow stud racing and after making attempts, the request is removed.
What if the owner of the lioness changed their mind after sending the request? Sorry but this isnt the stud's fault, so why should the stud pay the price of your uncertainty? Only send a request if you are 100% sure.

------------------------------

I tell you why compensating energy would not work.

Because of two reasons.

1. Direct energy compensation - If the request canceling happens while the stud is offline for some reason and most of his energy is replenished, then the refunded energy gets lost if it happens upon their next login. This could be maybe avoided if the stud gets a button next to their energy bar to use the additional refunded energy at will. This could be abused, though. Maybe not if an expiration would be implemented.

2. Item energy compensation - People could send requests to friends and gain the energy items, hoard them and either sell them or use them on the next king. This could be maybe avoided by making the item bound to the account AND to the lion, making the item have an expiration of -say- 1-2 days.
-----------------------------

I also would suggest - to avoid potential abuse- to disable stud requests sent between bound accounts and known unbound side accounts.

----------------------

Something has to be done about this, though. It isnt the stud's fault that people want muties and dont use Black Stallion to ensure a quick breeding. Neither is it fair to allow people to take advantage of others in such a manner, making them work for something, only to see no reward for it. Or any kind of payment.

------------------------

Because honestly, in the end, VLF is supposed to be undesirable, even if it produces muties at a higher rate. This is why lionesses lose fertility as they age. This isnt supposed to make them more valuable according to how it works in the game.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Fart (#25392)

Holy
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2017-09-04 03:58:39
It is absolutely ridiculous to demand compensation for situations where you "wasted" energy on a stud request. If it bothers you that much, there is already an easy option in place for you: don't accept VLFs. Problem solved.

The solutions to this non-problem are overly complicated and comedically biased. There's no way for the mods to fairly implement a system like the ones suggested and they shouldn't be expected to micromanage their players on that level.

It is not taking advantage of you if someone sends you a 1% and later removes the request. Is it kind of rude? Sure. But your own greed got you into the situation to begin with. Either the lioness's fertility was revealed, in which case you knew she was a 1%, or it wasn't, in which case you knew she could be a 1%. You could have chosen to simply reject VLFs, but you didn't because you wanted those sweet stud fees. And now that your gamble failed and you've been burned by your greed you've decided that others should for pay your own failure. It's absurd and entitled.

Stop accepting requests from VLF lionesses. You will never "waste" energy ever again, and VLFs will become undesirable because some studs may not accept them. But of course, that's the solution that doesn't give you SB for services not rendered and carte blanche to complain about how others are taking advantage of you for terrible crime of not playing the game the way you think they should.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Fish (#121957)

Indifferent
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2017-09-08 22:51:43
I disagree and agree. If your account says no stud-racing, then don't do it. But if it doesn't I really don't see a problem. But it would be nice if they at least got some energy back.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Jen(Clean Prismatic
P. Cross) (#53136)

Heartless
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2017-10-12 16:46:15
I have mixed emotions on this. On one hand, I agree to this concerning VLFs. However, I don't bother breeding VLFs, and the problem I encounter when sending a single request to a single stud per lioness is that sometimes these requests are never read, even if the player has been on fairly recently, and the lionesse's heat cycle is only 3 days. What I typically do is send a request, give the other person a day or so to respond, then send another request as a way of hedging my bets in case the person doesn't get on in time or doesn't respond for whatever reason. I do not see this as unfair. The lions in question never try to breed with my female: if they did I would of course keep open communication and give them a chance.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Feral (#66254)

King of the Jungle
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2017-11-15 03:28:31
One thing I'd note... If this is implemented you might wind up with extremely unethical stud players who make exactly 1 attempt on a VLF, and then leave it, so that the requester ends up paying half a stud fee for nothing.

I'd make it so that the requester can cancel and request to another stud and not lose the fee, or some such. Just don't allow 2 open stud requests at once.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Kristen (#67627)

Impeccable
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-01-16 17:47:29
Support, but would definitely need some tweaks.

I can see complaints on both sides, and I have personally been on both sides. If you are the studder, it is very disheartening to spend 30+ times trying to breed a female and then have her suddenly removed from your list. On the other hand, it is also very frustrating to wait for another user to come on, and then have your request languish until she's almost out of heat and you're forced to quickly make a different plan.

I don't think I support blocking stud racing entirely, but I would like to see any of the below as alternative options:

1) "My stud fee is X; I require Y% down for fertility under Z%"
*Keeps your stud fee the same but then there's banked funds. This way at least you get some of the stud fee back, even if you aren't successful. Then people who don't want to opt into the down payment system can set to 0% down payment, and people who want to opt into the down payment but don't care about fertility levels can set Z% to 100.

*Down payment could be paid upon first "Accept" click by stud, regardless of success, but full amount sent only when lioness is impregnated

*Payment in full would not be required until lioness is pregnant, would only be sent to successful studder

2) "My stud fee is X with Y% required in advance"
*Same as above - doesn't really account for fertility but thus doesn't penalize for fertility; it's a flat policy

3) Ability to set different stud fees per number of attempts, like so:
"My stud fee is:
X for 0-10 attempts
+Y for 11-20 attempts
+Z for 30+ attempts"

Then you get paid on success or the tenth attempt, whichever comes first, with bonuses possible if it takes you more than ten tries.

4) Have a ticky box that says "I accept/do not accept lionesses with existing stud requests"

For the people who say "well, you can do this already..." Well, yes, but you can't do it officially, which always comes with a risk.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Bezthiel 🍉 (#81210)

Lone Wanderer
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-01-17 09:09:44
Quote from above:

"I don't bother breeding VLFs, and the problem I encounter when sending a single request to a single stud per lioness is that sometimes these requests are never read".

Do I open dialogue if the stud has been online? Sure. But I also just send another stud request to someone else. No energy, time, items, money, or anything at all has been lost by the person who doesn't get that lioness pregnant, because she was (usually, considering I chasteberry to 80%+) covered on the first try.

It seems... convoluted to set up a stud race system when there is now one in place that allows you to completely block the most energy-consuming lionesses from even having stud requests sent to you. If you don't want to be unknowingly involved in a stud race for VLFs, you can now block people from even sending you a VLF request at all.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?



Topic is locked




Memory Used: 654.96 KB - Queries: 0 - Query Time: 0.00000 - Total Time: 0.00446s