New add on: Males can have temporary monarchs too.

You have liked this post!

I'm sure the devs can find a way to find a feasible way to add in this suggestion-- everything's *possible* anyways

You have liked this post!

These add ons you keep adding to this suggestion help nothing and no one on this thread even want's this suggestion plus 86 other people have selected no support so I doubt whatever you want to add on will change the mind's of 86 people who don't support this.

You have liked this post!

I'm just talking about my support on this suggestion.

You have liked this post!

With the amount of add-ons you keep tacking on, you might as well make your own post... Not even OP is defending their suggestion as vehemently as you are.

You have liked this post!

(I think it's a main and side account?)

You have liked this post!

I think everyone has beat this topic to death but I see it still getting bumped so I will give my thoughts

1. Having a female leader has no in game benefits, literally none. A leader you can only breed every 20 days is quite literally useless in terms of breeding viability. I breed the majority of my pride to my king, that's what they're there for. If you want your leader to just be a trophy, that's already an option. People do that, you don't have to breed your king if you don't want to
2. You can't amend the issue with allowing submales to breed. That is literally on the auto-reject suggestion post. As of now, allowing submales to breed is NOT going to happen. Even if it's just to the queen
3. I wouldn't mind, say, a pronouns option for more inclusive kings. Most of my kings have been female (my current is actually my first male) in lore and in reference. But a massive game overhaul is just overkill for what is really a non issue

Basically, I think the current lab frog deal is a good enough one for female leaders. And that's coming from someone who is very attached to having queens who impregnate lionesses with science defying lesbian powers

You have liked this post!

Oh, just realised it - female leader would be an open gate for Crunchy Worm Abuse. You can keep your leader's looks forever, just choose old king's looks every time you retire. Wont even need those Yohimbe Barks anymore, just keep a female leader and crunchy worm her forever with no limits. That cannot be added into the game.

You have liked this post!

I forgot about the crunchy worm item. That is a wonderful point Mad Hyena

You have liked this post!

We could just st remove the option to keep leader's looks

You have liked this post!

Oh, fantastic point. The RLC market would be slaughtered by that. Effectively unlimited heats on a RLC? Plop her as queen on a side and never worry about keeping the line alive again

You have liked this post!

And to comment on Ready Test's comment I see no reason why to remove the keep leader's look option just for this suggestion that only you at this point are defending so hard.

You have liked this post!

Remove it from the game altogether or just for female leaders?

Either way, congrats, you've removed mut/stat/heritage repping, a massive component of the game

You have liked this post!

We could just remove the option to keep leader's looks so that we don't run into this problem. The option (IMO) is not much of a use anyway to me, and the fact that a lion can morph into their processor's looks really irks me

You have liked this post!

Well, maybe the option being just for male leaders as to prevent this abuse.

You have liked this post!