Posted by Give our Kings a Queen

Garet (#19860)

King of the Jungle
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2013-11-24 04:29:46
Since we do have one dominant male, why not have one dominant female as well? Asiatic lions have female-run prides, and within African prides, there are dominant females. It'd still be realistic, even moreso than what we have now.
I've got a few ideas that might make her useful, rather than 'just a pretty lioness we can't chase';

Our Queen would be locked to our accounts and be given her own slot. The Queen wouldn't take up a territory slot, and like our Kings, we could only have one Queen per pride. It should cost the same to retire her as it would a King, and she would not run off if too hungry or bored. Yes, you will have to play with and feed your Queen.

Like Kings, we would be able to chose an heir for her when retiring or when she comes of age. We would be able to chose to keep her looks or use those of the new Queen. Thus, we could customize her or her heir and keep that look for as long as we want to.

Unlike other females, the Queen wouldn't go hunting. She would have a different way of gaining stats. The Queen would be in charge of domestic-related issues. Teaching cubs /adolescents to hunt, fending off males/females at our borders, the likes. Each hour, we could chose to have her perform one of these duties and gain stats/exp. The former would also have a small chance of giving cubs stats, along with a slightly higher chance of giving the Queen stats. The Queen would only be able to take up to five cubs/adolescents under her wing at a time.

She would be able to breed as well, but I think a cub with a Queen should get slightly higher stats. Nothing insane like +50 in all stats, but something small, like +1-5 across the boards.

Edit: Like people have mentioned, this should be optional, like with submales. That way people wouldn't have to necessarily get one if they don't want one.



This suggestion has 1708 supports and 112 NO supports.



Hrt Icon 1 player likes this post! Like?

Edited on 01/12/13 by Garet (#19860)

Magnituda [sunrise
project] (#198042)


View Forum Posts


Posted on
2020-07-20 09:13:21
Yeah... But having ONLY king isn't breaking the game because it's only one lion. If you could have king and queen - this would. I don't think that you understand that now if you want to have for example pair of feruses (as only this could boost your chances for a ferus cub) - or just low gen lions with high stats, with your dream perfect looks AND for example low gen heritage - it's extremely difficult. With king it's simpler because you can mutie replace him with low gen ferus and keep looks of the old king and boom! You have one perfect lion. But you still would have to work really hard to find low gen ferus girl with the marks you want.

But with this idea of queens? You could just do the same with the female and with much much less effort you would achieve your breeding goal (because you could breed perfect looking gal and replace her with ncl or G2 cub with high stats). So it does break a game.

I would support ONLY if queen would be normal lion - no replacement - if she dies, she dies and you can't keep her looks. But she would have her own slot and title if it's really that important to make it official 🙄



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?


Edited on 20/07/20 @ 09:16:10 by Magnituda (#198042)







Memory Used: 641.57 KB - Queries: 0 - Query Time: 0.00000 - Total Time: 0.00551s