|
|
---|---|
Posted by | Enable Double Markings Again [1200+ Support] |
Heda Vampiric (#56702) Prophet View Forum Posts Posted on 2017-10-13 11:20:15 |
Enable Double Markings When Breeding Parents (Or One Parent) That Have(/Has) The Same Marking In Separate Slots, Again.This was briefly, although windedly, mentioned in another thread I made.
|
FlameHeart (#233839)
King of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-02-04 14:43:13 |
Sorry, not supporting. Tbh I find it a bit redundant. The marking will show up the same regardless. Also, won't this affect the market value lions with BO and tier 3 and 4 markings? 0 players like this post! Like? Edited on 04/02/23 @ 14:45:32 by FlameHeart (#233839) |
Heda Vampiric (#56702)
Prophet View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-02-04 15:46:01 |
The marking will not show up the same. It will show up “doubled”. Markings are not made with a solid line brush. They’re blended, they have edges, they have opacity. Stacking markings strengthens the markings look past the 100% a single marking allows. Look at a lion in wardrobe with Noctis margay once vs that lion with Noctis margay 3-4 times. It’s stronger. Now some people might not like how that looks, but that’s subjective and people should be allowed to have it if that’s what they want since if you don’t want it you simply don’t have to breed it. Also, a friendly reminder that you can get markings in more than one slot on accident via apps - as Typhon just mentioned getting the same marking from RMAs. That’s the true redundancy because you can’t even pass them on. I don’t mean to seem like I’m coming out of the gate swinging, but this comes off as extremely ignorant of the situation. I’m not sure what you mean by your edited in comment about the value of lions as this suggestion would just make it so people can pass on a marking twice when the parents have it compared to cubs having either one of the slots or the other. 1 player likes this post! Like? |
Myr [frozen - contact @ #76] (#188) View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-02-04 15:51:48 |
Arguably this would help increase some lion values, rather than the opposite. Any lion which has duplicated markings - whether from the 1in4 apps from events, or from RMAs etc - would have more flexibility if it were possible for them to pass the marking on in both slots. In the case of kings with expensive/rare markings doubled due to RMA luck then that would certainly increase their usefulness and therefore their value for most breeders. I don't see that this change would have any negative effect on values, personally 0 players like this post! Like? |
FlameHeart (#233839)
King of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-02-04 15:54:04 |
🌻 the serval spots (#98320) Heartless View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-02-11 17:43:39 |
Ricky [Git gud lol] (#177615)
Notable Lion View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-02-26 09:41:24 |
Asteria | She/They | (#239069)
King of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-02-26 09:57:58 |
Honestly disappointed that this post was made in 2017, that was five years ago, and the feature still has not been re-implemented. By October of this year, it'll have been six years of the player base asking for a feature that we used to have be added back. I was never around for the double marking breeding, but seeing how many people over the years have talked about their breeding projects being ruined, or their stud values going down, or quite simply being disappointed with the lack of communication is disheartening. Bring back the ability to breed double markings, please. 0 players like this post! Like? |
Heda Vampiric (#56702)
Prophet View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-02-26 11:28:09 |
There was actually a poll about this… I do not remember when. I would have to look into it. But I don’t think it was too long ago. Maybe within the last year? Anyway it was a poll with minimal information and no link to this thread, but the user base votes were too evenly split so they decided to do nothing. In my opinion, this was a very unfair poll, and I would have appreciated a more open discussion. But they’ve let this thread stay up, so hopefully one day we might get them back. Edit; I’m not sure why the font is not legible to you Rufus, unless you have an extension or something in your browser. It’s Times New Roman; a standard and legible font. 0 players like this post! Like? Edited on 26/02/23 @ 11:30:06 by Heda Vampiric (#56702) |
Ricky [Git gud lol] (#177615)
Notable Lion View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-02-26 11:41:25 |
Oh yeah I can't read times New Roman, got some issues with it eyesight wise. I'll have to copy paste everything onto a doc to read it in a bit, but I'm a bit busy rn lol 0 players like this post! Like? |
Heda Vampiric (#56702)
Prophet View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-02-26 11:54:09 |
Myr [frozen - contact @ #76] (#188) View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-02-26 12:15:55 |
Unfortunately I think the poll on this a little while back had exactly the same issue a lot of site-wide polls from news posts do - people vote hastily based on very little information and without knowing the context or longterm implications. It's just the nature of those polls, especially because typically very little extra info or links is given, and people are just clicking through quickly from the news. Votes on polls usually skew very differently to votes on forum suggestions, which is a dead giveaway imo. Suggestions obviously get less engagement overall because you more or less have to go looking for them, but then by definition the people who do vote tend to have given it a lot more thought. Which is why it doesn't really make sense to me to leave complex issues to be decided in polls tbh, because the nuance just isn't there at all :( With the poll on this in particular, I know from chat comments at the time that a lot of people were definitely confused by the whole double/duplicate marking issue. Many didn't understood that there could be any potential advantages, or that doubles could be easily avoided if unwanted - just by making different breeding choices. People were just reacting in a 'hell no I don't want my lions to get random duplicates and lose value' kind of way, which was sort of inevitable in that situation. I really hope given the continued popularity and support on this post that maybe the issue will be revisited in future... 0 players like this post! Like? |
Ladwick (#12065)
View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-02-28 03:16:33 |
Talmoi (#16689)
Heartless View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-02-28 03:23:09 |
The thing that annoys me the most about this not being re-enabled is while it was possible for years no one complained about it, it was never an issue. So i think it could have been quickly re-enabled and we all could have moved on with our projects. All these years later and I’m still waiting in hope, bumping the heck out of this thread Also I went looking for the poll, it’s currently on page 15. There are soo many forgotten polls, things that won and never changed. 0 players like this post! Like? |
Heda Vampiric (#56702)
Prophet View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-02-28 04:35:57 |
[△] Nadir (#108458)
Prophet View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-03-04 14:17:42 |
It breaks my heart that this thread hasn't been addressed yet despite them putting it to poll and winning. I'm beginning to wonder if we're ever going to see badly desired changes again. 0 players like this post! Like? |